<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) in House (111th Congress)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.actonprinciples.org/uafa-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.actonprinciples.org</link>
	<description>Turning Principles into Equality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:53:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.actonprinciples.org/uafa-house/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actonprinciples.org/?page_id=1669#comment-397</guid>
		<description>California State Passed a resolution this past Month in support of UAFA.  I am wondering - if Arizona can get away with State Law treading on the toes of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, why can&#039;t California do the same, but in reverse,  make a law protecting same sex couples from being deported by providing State Sanctuary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California State Passed a resolution this past Month in support of UAFA.  I am wondering &#8211; if Arizona can get away with State Law treading on the toes of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, why can&#8217;t California do the same, but in reverse,  make a law protecting same sex couples from being deported by providing State Sanctuary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy_b</title>
		<link>http://www.actonprinciples.org/uafa-house/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>roy_b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actonprinciples.org/?page_id=1669#comment-319</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s sad that this bill hasn&#039;t passed with flying colors, we live in a backward country!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s sad that this bill hasn&#8217;t passed with flying colors, we live in a backward country!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is UAFA still in the committees? - Page 2</title>
		<link>http://www.actonprinciples.org/uafa-house/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is UAFA still in the committees? - Page 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actonprinciples.org/?page_id=1669#comment-266</guid>
		<description>[...] email them and beg them to change their vote.  Here is the whip count for the House: ACT On Principles Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) in House  And Senate: ACT On Principles Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) in Senate  Please, send your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] email them and beg them to change their vote.  Here is the whip count for the House: ACT On Principles Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) in House  And Senate: ACT On Principles Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) in Senate  Please, send your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bare</title>
		<link>http://www.actonprinciples.org/uafa-house/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actonprinciples.org/?page_id=1669#comment-163</guid>
		<description>@Rich Hi Rich, great that you are keeping track.  This site has no staff - all content including the whips are maintained by the users themselves, so when you see things that need to change it is very very easy to login and edit their positions.  The more folks keep track of their legislators, and call them and ask about their positions, then report back here...then they get the idea that they are accountable to their electorate...and that is how we all get equality and better government. And when you need help calling attention to a particular bill or a particular legislator, you can post an action on the actions pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rich Hi Rich, great that you are keeping track.  This site has no staff &#8211; all content including the whips are maintained by the users themselves, so when you see things that need to change it is very very easy to login and edit their positions.  The more folks keep track of their legislators, and call them and ask about their positions, then report back here&#8230;then they get the idea that they are accountable to their electorate&#8230;and that is how we all get equality and better government. And when you need help calling attention to a particular bill or a particular legislator, you can post an action on the actions pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich givens</title>
		<link>http://www.actonprinciples.org/uafa-house/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich givens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actonprinciples.org/?page_id=1669#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Grayson, Alan (D FL-08) is now a Co-Sponsor. One additional member has signed on in recent days bringing the total to 118. The site needs to be updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grayson, Alan (D FL-08) is now a Co-Sponsor. One additional member has signed on in recent days bringing the total to 118. The site needs to be updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
