|
|||||
|
From GetEqual:
New York is having primary Senatorial Debates (monday/tues). [Try to get the question in your state's debates as well.] Please forward the questions below to: In subject put: Questions on Civil Rights for Senate Debate: 1. Senator Gillibrand has been up front in supporting the inclusion of “sexual orientation and gender identity” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Would you support a bill to place “sexual orienta…tion and gender identity” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which currently protects people from discrimination based on their “race, color, sex, national origin, or religion.” And if so, would you be an original sponsor of such a bill in 2011? Or the longer version: 2. Senator Gillibrand has been up front in supporting the inclusion of “sexual orientation and gender identity” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Would you support a bill to place “sexual orientation and gender identity” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which currently protects people from discrimination based on their “race, color, sex, national origin, or religion”” in vast areas of life including “employment, housing, access to credit, gov’t facilities, private places open to the public, and all federally funded programs”. And if so, would you be an original sponsor of such a bill in 2011?
You’ve paid your dues and through the nose. You’ve heard and said it all. You’re done with all the drama. You did your part. But what did you do it for? One of my oldest friends is still in the grassroots game. He’s even coined the new phase: Stonewall 2.0. But he’s taking a pass on “federal activism,” having seen the demise of the National Equality March organization and lived through the tortured takeover of Equality Across America by the International Socialist Organization (ISO). Understandably scared away, his focus now is on “building a [state-level grassroots] activist network that can respond ad hoc to developments of concern to our community.” To me this sounds like activism for activism sake; a reactive army, without strategy or focus. And it sounds like a different person. Really, dear old friend? Really? Is that your intention now? That wasn’t your motivation when we started. You were driven by your childhood suffering (in a state that recently created a decoy prom for the gays and misfits). You were intent on changing the laws and government culture. You took on city police commissioners over entrapment. You forced hate crimes reporting and enforcement. You lobbied law after law for state equal rights and fought marriage referendum. You helped elect Mayors and Governors and Senators and Presidents. But for what? Here we are with a President that is a direct product of the black Civil Rights struggle and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which made it the U.S. public policy not to discriminate based on race. And yet, here we are with no federal Civil Rights protection for our community. No hope in sight of ever having an openly gay or lesbian or transgendered President. And no end game in play. Is that what we’ve worked all this time for? No. But you don’t want to be involved in “federal activism.” Well old friend, that’s not good enough. We can’t count on your new ad hoc responder network. We can’t count on new edgy activists that go mainstream in minutes. We can’t wait decades to make insider contacts. And we can’t do this without the veteran experts. We need our use-to-be activists to resurrect and those still in the game, like you, to reconnect to their youthful intentions. Because a narrow window of opportunity is now open and the time has come to protect our community with America’s civil rights laws. Now. In Obama’s 1st term. We cannot count on a 2nd and should not have to wait anyway. For this, there is a new proposed bill called The American Equality Bill, created by EqualityGiving and written by Karen Doering (former Senior Counsel for the National Center for Lesbian Rights), which seeks to just that. It puts SO+GI right along side “race, color, sex, national origin and religion” where we’ve belonged all along. It’s ready to go and sponsors are being sought for filing in November, with an impatient and ambitious view toward public hearings by May of next year, and passage by June of 2012. But it’s all grassroots and it needs you. Filing it alone will ignite a conversation long over due about homophobia and civil rights. In fact, filing the bill will represent a statement about our own dignity that, by itself, will start to free our youth from the 2nd class reality they continue to experience. Because filing it says: “We are entitled to the same protections the President had as a child. We are equal.” It will show your ad hoc response team that there is a prize we deserve greater than anything they are aware of, and much more than we have asked for so far, or they know to seek. This is what the elders are supposed to be doing. But to file and pass this legislation our community needs you working exactly where you are – in your state, not just building networks, but engaging them. This is not federal activism. It is state activism. The Congressional sponsors and Senate sponsors will come from the states. The votes will come from the states. And the activists needed to make this dream a reality will come from the states. This is what we have prepared ourselves for our entire lives. This is the struggle for which we honed our politics and built our organizations. This is the civil rights struggle of the millennium and it needs you. It is not time to stand down, old friend. It is time to stand up.
Cleveland OH just became the 33rd city in this nation to support the passage of the Uniting American Families Act! Many thanks to Tim K for getting this resolution passed! Below is a report from him that we would like to share with you!
out4immigration.blogspot.com
From Fight Back New York: Earlier this week, the anti-gay group New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms sent out an appeal to raise $200,000 to combat what Fight Back New York is doing during the upcoming primary and general elections. Here is part of their message: “NYCFPAC’s goal is to raise $200,000 between now and Election Day…In December 2009, 38 state senators courageously voted against same-sex marriage legislation. Supporters of same-sex marriage…are targeting those same 38 senators for defeat…If pro-life, pro-family, and pro-freedom New Yorkers want our elected officials to stand up for our values, we must support those candidates and elected officials who do so.” This means that they will be pouring money into the campaigns of longtime anti-gay senators like Ruben Diaz and Bill Stachowski. We need your help to make sure that we have the resources to overwhelm these anti-gay tactics. We know that our strategy is smart and effective–otherwise groups like this wouldn’t be so worried. They know that Fight Back New York played an instrumental role in defeating one of their candidates, the convicted criminal Hiram Monserrate. Please contribute $20, $50, or $100 today. Remember the anger you felt towards each of the 38 state senators who voted against the equality of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers? Now you have a chance to FIGHT BACK and send the message that you are in this to win, and will stop at nothing until LGBT New Yorkers have equal rights. Your support of Fight Back New York helps us tell the truth about these backward and ineffective state senators. Click here for an example of what we’re doing right now in Sen. Bill Stachowski’s distict. Join us today by donating $20, $50, or $100. Turn your anger into action. More Here: https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/6164/shop/custom.jsp?donate_page_KEY=4081
Another great civil disobedience day exposing injustice. Read full article here.
Last week, President Obama stood on principle. At an Iftar dinner at the White House celebrating the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, the President announced of his belief in the right to build a mosque in Lower Manhattan because of the constitutional right to freedom of religion. Politico described it like this:
Those who believe in basic constitutional rights welcome this development. We should commend the President for standing on principle and honoring his oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Mike Allen later reported in Playbook the process that lead to the President’s announcement at the dinner:
This sounds like the Obama who campaigned on change and gave us something to hope for. Something here really irks me, though. President Obama is standing on part-time principles. Only sometimes will he make a solid argument for the undeniable rights of a minority. As a state Senate candidate in 1996, Barack Obama said on a signed questionnaire for a gay and lesbian newspaper in Chicago:
Back in 1996, Barack Obama took a principled stand on marriage equality. In 2010, he has regressed and abandoned that position. That’s part-time principles. Since the President has taken office, we’ve seen some amazing developments in the fight to win marriage equality: the Iowa Supreme Court ruled unanimously that denying civil marriage rights to gay and lesbian couples was unconstitutional; New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine each passed legislation providing for equal marriage rights; the freedom to marry suffered a heartbreaking defeat at the polls in Maine; and recently Proposition 8 was ruled unconstitutional by a Federal judge. These developments have provided ample opportunity for the White House to, at a minimum, acknowledge the deep emotional highs and lows being experienced by the LGBT community as we fight to win civil equality. However, the WH has offered very little, sometimes making a cursory statement and other times being stunningly silent. Sometimes the silence is the worst; other times cursory statements are worse. Increasingly, courts are affirming marriage for gays and lesbians as an undeniable constitutional right. The President is backing himself into a corner in which he will no longer be able to play coy on the issue of marriage quality. He didn’t campaign on part-time change or part-time hope and we don’t need a President with part-time principles.
|
|||||
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Copyright © 2009 - 2012 ActOnPrinciples.org - All Rights Reserved | Website: LEFT Marketing
POSTS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THEIR AUTHORS